What types of rocks are good for radiometric dating dating using astrology
Recent research by a team of creation scientists known as the RATE (arth) group has demonstrated the unreliability of radiometric dating techniques.Even the use of isochron dating, which is supposed to eliminate some initial condition assumptions, produces dates that are not reliable.Uniformitarian geologists use so-called dating methods to determine the ages of the surrounding rocks.Certain types of rocks, especially those that form from magma (igneous), contain radioactive isotopes of different elements.
You can use the hourglass to tell time if you know several things: the amount of sand in the top of the hourglass when it started flowing, the rate that the sand flows through the hole in the middle, and that the quantity of sand in each chamber has not been tampered with.
It is possible to measure the ratio of the different radioactive parent isotopes and their daughter isotopes in a rock, but the ratios are not dates or ages.
The dates must be inferred based on assumptions about the ratios.
The reason this age may not be a true age—even though it is commonly called an absolute age—is that it is based on several crucial assumptions.
Most radiometric dating techniques must make three assumptions: The major problem with the first assumption is that there is no way to prove that the decay rate was not different at some point in the past.
The claimed “fact” that decay rates have always been constant is actually an inference based on a uniformitarian assumption.