Who invented radioactive dating for the turin shroud
In the end, we do not know how the Shroud was made, nor do we know how old it is, but we also do not need to know. Even the Apostles did not appeal to physical evidence for the Resurrection. Those testimonies are still with us today, in the pages of the New Testament.There is a controversial piece of linen cloth residing in a cathedral in Turin, northern Italy.In 1532 the Shroud suffered fire damage in the chapel where it was housed.Since it was folded at the time, this resulted in a series of repetitive burn holes.We should also not overlook the ingenuity of medieval artisans.For example, Leonardo da Vinci was known for his detailed descriptions of anatomy and the mechanical structures that he engineered.
This review depends heavily on two recent books, both of which argue for the authenticity of the Shroud.
Provenance: Many false relics are known from the Middle Ages, including many from the regions of northern Italy and France.
This raises the suspicion that the Shroud is also a forgery, since it was first displayed in the 14 century in France.
Figure 1: The Shroud of Turin contains a faint dorsal (top half) and frontal (lower half) image of a man, with many features paralleling the Crucifixion.
Yet, the historical record of the Shroud is spotty, multiple features on it conflict with the biblical record of events, and carbon dating places it squarely in the medieval era.Here we present our view on the authenticity of the Shroud.